💥 0 to $85,678 MRR in a few years

Hey,

FounderShark is back!

Welcome to our new post.

Generating $85,678 MRR with a no-code website builder

In his late 20’s Jake was tired of climbing the corporate ladder at a. young age. Instead, he developed one of the best no-code website development tool QuickElements.

I’ve put together some of the best moments from his journey. 👇

3rd Option

Jake was your friendly-neighborhood website developer hopping from task to task. He knew this future wasn’t meant for him, so he decided to get into the world of entrepreneurship. He was seeking problems to solve, little did he know, the biggest problem was just underneath his nose. There wasn’t a tool in website industry that allowed you to run an online business. Of course you could always spend thousands of dollars to integrate different tools or you could build everything yourself which would inevitably exhaust the sh*t out of you, but there had to be a better way, right? Jake took this opportunity and created a 3rd option for all the entrepreneurs, QuickElements which is able to assist you in blogging, E-commerce, service based businesses, print on demand, and even restaurant websites. The tool is doing exceedingly well at the moment, and in the near future, it is predicted to generate $85,678 per month in recurring revenue allowing everyone in the company to be paid generously.

But that’s not everything… Here’s a piece of advice Jake applied to his life every single day.

Quantity vs Quality

Let me tell you a story. On the first day of class, Jerry Uelsmann, a professor at the University of Florida, divided his film photography students into two groups.

Everyone on the left side of the classroom, would be in the “quantity” group. They would be graded solely on the amount of work they produced. On the final day of class, he would tally the number of photos submitted by each student. One hundred photos would rate an A, ninety photos a B, eighty photos a C, and so on.

Meanwhile, everyone on the right side of the room would be in the “quality” group. They would be graded only on the excellence of their work. They would only need to produce one photo during the semester, but to get an A, it had to be a nearly perfect image.

At the end of the term, he was surprised to find that all the best photos were produced by the quantity group. During the semester, these students were busy taking photos, experimenting with composition and lighting, testing out various methods in the darkroom, and learning from their mistakes. In the process of creating hundreds of photos, they honed their skills. Meanwhile, the quality group sat around speculating about perfection. In the end, they had little to show for their efforts other than unverified theories and one mediocre photo.

Just try, and you will fail, but it's better than not trying.

Until next time,

FounderShark!

Recommended video: Master the Perfect ChatGPT Prompt Formula (in just 8 minutes)!

If you enjoyed this, please consider sharing it with a friend. If a friend sent you this, get the next newsletter by signing up here.

Read all the old case studies here.